Section 6 β Pasting Assembly: Answer-Valued Fields #
The answer-valued averaged family fields of the successor route, and the two assemblies that
feed them to pasting: the induction-section pasting from an explicit commutativity input, and
that commutativity input itself, for the point-equivalent ordinary carrier. This is the
counterpart of
MIPRE/Background/LIDT/MIPStarRE/LDT/MainInductionStep/Theorems/PastingAssembly/AnswerFields.lean
in the port of planning/c6b-plan.md (milestone M12, section "Port conventions").
Translation #
A strategy is an AnswerSymStrat params.next π K (Co/Test/StrategyCore.lean), whose state is
the symmetric model strategy.state : SymModel π K; its point-equivalent ordinary carrier is Co
answerSelfImprovementCarrier, a SymStrat params.next π K with the same state.
IdxPolyFamily params ΞΉ is IdxPolyFamily params π, Error is β, and the relations
(ConsRel, and the SDDOpRel behind answerCommutativityPoints) are read on
strategy.state. The error functions (mainInductionError, mainInductionNu,
selfImprovementInInductionError, ldPastingInInductionError, ldPastingInInductionNu) are
the vendored classical declarations, reached through explicit open lists. The vendored file-wide
respectTransparency false is not needed: the file sets no option.
Dropped and threaded hypotheses #
No vendored statement here has a swap, density or normalization hypothesis. The vendored proof
of answerComMainForCarrier_ofAnswerGood passes carrier.isNormalized to
comMain_of_commutativityPoints, whose Co counterpart takes no normalization argument.
answerSuccessorAveragedFamilyFields_ofMainInductionHypothesis runs Co
answerSuccessorSelfImprovementOutputs_ofMainInductionHypothesis, which takes the model
hypotheses hS : strategy.state.toBipartite.IsFinitePair and
hA : NoAbelianProj strategy.state.toBipartite.opsA of the predecessor
AnswerMainInductionHypothesis and hd : 1 β€ params.d of the ported self-improvement theorem;
so it takes hS hA hd right after strategy, in the same position. Its induction hypothesis is
AnswerMainInductionHypothesis.{uF, uP, uK}, where the vendored one is .{uF, uΞΉ'}, and its
universe binder is .{uF} where the vendored one is .{uΞΉ', uF}, π and K being the file's
variables, as in Co StageDataConstructors. The two pasting
assemblies take no new hypothesis: pasting neither orthonormalizes nor solves a semidefinite
program.
Proofs that differ from the vendored ones #
- The carrier
answerSelfImprovementCarrier params.next strategyhas the state, the point measurement and the axis-parallel measurement ofstrategy, so its axis-parallel and self-consistency failure probabilities, its completeness, consistency, strong self-consistency, its tensor failure expectations and the products of its point measurements are those ofstrategyby definitional equality: the vendoredsimpa [carrier, answerSelfImprovementCarrier]transfers and theunfold β¦ ; simpfailure-probability identities are dropped, the hypotheses being passed directly. - In
answerSuccessorAveragedFamilyFields_ofMainInductionHypothesisthe four family fields are the CoPastingAssembly/Basiclemmas applied to the slice outputs as they stand, with nosimpa, and the bound onΞΊis onelinarith. answerComMainForCarrier_ofAnswerGoodis one term: CocomMain_of_commutativityPointson the carrier, applied to CoanswerCommutativityPointswith nochange.
Not ported #
Every declaration of the vendored file has a counterpart here.
References #
In LionSR/MIPStarRE at commit 507e8122, not in this repository:
references/ldt-paper/inductive_step.texblueprint/src/chapter/ch10_induction.tex
Assemble the averaged polynomial family fields in the answer-valued successor route.
Paper origin: references/ldt-paper/inductive_step.tex:461-551.
The statement records exactly the conclusions obtained from the recursive
answer-valued slice measurements and the axis-parallel/self-consistency
self-improvement theorem: averaged completeness, point consistency with the
ambient answer-valued point measurement, strong self-consistency, the
slice-boundedness input for the point-equivalent ordinary carrier, and the two
scalar estimates for ΞΊ and ΞΆ.
Lean-only: The final boundedness field is expressed using
answerSelfImprovementCarrier only because the present boundedness interface is
typed for ordinary strategies. This theorem does not invoke
ldPastingInInductionSection, and does not assert that the carrier's dummy
diagonal measurement satisfies the answer-valued diagonal-line test. This
internal construction is tracked in issue #1507. Discharge: proved here from
the recursive answer-valued slice measurements and the answer-valued
self-improvement construction. The model hypotheses hS hA and hd : 1 β€ params.d are those
of the self-improvement outputs (module docstring).
Answer-valued induction-section pasting from an explicit commutativity input.
This theorem performs the checked final assembly once the answer-valued
analogue of the Section 11 commutativity theorem has been supplied for the
point-equivalent ordinary carrier. The hypotheses hcom and herror_le are
not source assumptions; they are the internal commutativity construction and
scalar absorption targets for the answer-valued pasting route.
Answer-valued Section 11 commutativity input needed by the positive-degree pasting branch.
This is a Lean-only construction target, not a source theorem and not a
hypothesis of thm:main-induction. It is the precise replacement for the invalid route
through the ordinary carrier's dummy diagonal measurement: the conclusion is
the ordinary ComMainConclusion for the point-equivalent carrier, but the
intended proof must use the answer-valued diagonal verifier relation of
strategy.
The proof first establishes the Section 10 point-commutativity estimate from
the answer-valued diagonal-line test, transfers that estimate to the
point-equivalent carrier, and then invokes the Section 11 scalar chain in its
form that assumes point commutativity rather than an ordinary diagonal
IsGood field.