Documentation

MIPRE.Background.LIDT.MIPStarRE.LDT.MakingMeasurementsProjective.Orthonormalization

Section 5 — Orthonormalization #

The orthonormalization theorem and scalar bookkeeping lemmas from Section 5.

lem:orthonormalization-main-lemma.

Paper origin: references/ldt-paper/orthonormalization.tex:282-310 (\label{lem:orthonormalization-main-lemma}).

This is the source-facing orthogonalization lemma for complete measurements. The theorem statement deliberately contains no spectral-truncation or repair input: those are steps in the proof of the paper lemma, not hypotheses of the lemma. The proof uses the locality-preserving projectivization repair in its heterogeneous left-register form.

Measurement-level orthonormalization from a cross-consistency hypothesis.

This is the measurement analogue of orthonormalizationMainLemma, with the paper's 84·ζ^{1/4} bound weakened to the public 100·ζ^{1/4} envelope.

Measurement-level orthonormalization for a complete measurement.

This is the measurement-level corollary of lem:orthonormalization-main-lemma; it does not assume the proof-stage spectral-truncation or repair data.

Measurement-level orthonormalization from cross consistency, using the locality-preserving Section 5 repair construction directly.

This is the source-faithful form needed by the final Step 6 construction: a cross-consistency estimate for the two unsymmetrized role measurements gives the projective submeasurement without an additional spectral-truncation or repair-input hypothesis.

Heterogeneous measurement-level orthonormalization from cross consistency.

This is the two-space form of lem:orthonormalization-main-lemma needed in the source proof of thm:main-formal: if complete measurements A and B on possibly different local spaces are consistent on a bipartite state, then A has a projective submeasurement close on Alice's tensor factor. No permutation-invariance or same-space identification is used.

Faithful encoding: Paper origin: references/ldt-paper/test_definition.tex:180-202 and references/ldt-paper/projectivization.tex; the heterogeneous form is the two-space tensor-factor version needed by the source proof.

Heterogeneous measurement-level orthonormalization on Bob's tensor factor.

This is the right-register counterpart of orthonormalizationMeasurement_of_consistency_from_projectivizationRepair_heterogeneous. If complete measurements A and B are consistent on a bipartite state, then B has a projective submeasurement close on Bob's tensor factor. No same-space identification or permutation-invariance hypothesis is used.

Faithful encoding: Paper origin: references/ldt-paper/test_definition.tex:180-202 and references/ldt-paper/projectivization.tex; the heterogeneous form is the two-space tensor-factor version needed by the source proof.

Completion-route orthonormalization with the documented weakened constant.

This theorem preserves the proved construction obtained by completing the submeasurement first and then applying the concrete Q/X/XHat/P repair route to the option-completed measurement. The conversion introduces the orthonormalizationCompletionRouteError ζ = 120 * ζ^(1/4) envelope.

This is not the source theorem thm:orthonormalization; the source theorem has the sharper orthonormalizationError ζ = 100 * ζ^(1/4) bound and is stated below as a separate proved theorem.

thm:orthonormalization.

A strongly self-consistent submeasurement on a permutation-invariant normalized state admits a close projective submeasurement with the paper's 100 * ζ^(1/4) error envelope.

Paper origin: references/ldt-paper/orthonormalization.tex:67-76 (\label{thm:orthonormalization}). The earlier proved completion-route construction remains available as orthonormalizationCompletionRoute, but its 120 * ζ^(1/4) conclusion is weaker than this source theorem. The proof below follows the paper's completion-to-measurement reduction and then feeds the completed measurement's self-consistency estimate into the sharp locality-preserving Section 5 repair route, recovering the paper's scalar constant.