Section 5 — basic projectivization data #
This module contains the scalar estimates and elementary transport lemmas used
by the orthonormalization projectivization chain. The mathematical source is the
orthonormalization-and-completion argument in inductive_step.tex, lines
130--149, together with the orthonormalization theorem and the completion
proposition cited there.
The declarations here are deliberately prior to the construction of the final
projective measurements. They record the literal scalar obtained by composing
orthonormalization with completion, its absorbed form in the unit-error regime,
the right-register transport available under permutation invariance, and the
residual hypotheses passed to the self-consistency handoff theorem. The actual
projective-measurement output theorem is in ProjectivizationChain.Output.
The scalar computation is
ζ₂ = 2 · (100·ζ^{1/4}) + 4 · √(100·ζ^{1/4}) + 2·ζ
= 200·ζ^{1/4} + 40·ζ^{1/8} + 2·ζ.
The paper prints the closed form ζ₂ = 200·ζ^{1/4} + 40·ζ^{1/8}. The Lean
cascade uses the slightly widened absorbed scalar
200·ζ^{1/4} + 42·ζ^{1/8} downstream, since in the non-vacuous regime
0 ≤ ζ ≤ 1 gives 2·ζ ≤ 2·ζ^{1/8}.
Status #
- The orthonormalization step uses the source theorem
orthonormalization. The theorem has a tracked proof gap for the sharp paper constant; this file no longer exposes its proof-stage construction data as a hypothesis of the orthonormalization projectivization output statement. - The completion step uses the fully-formalized
completingToMeasurement(\leanokinblueprint/src/chapter/ch03_preliminaries.tex), so no new bridge is introduced here. - The output
Qis now aProjMeas. This uses the generic helperPreliminaries.completeAtOutcomeProj, whose proof relies only on the existing facts thatP.totalis a projection and that eachP_ais absorbed byP.total.
References #
- Paper:
references/ldt-paper/inductive_step.texlines 130–149 (application oflem:orthonormalization-main-lemma+prop:completing-to-measurement). - Paper:
references/ldt-paper/orthonormalization.texlines 67–77 (thm:orthonormalization). - Paper:
references/ldt-paper/preliminaries.texlines 1101–1170 (prop:completing-to-measurement). - Blueprint:
blueprint/src/chapter/ch10_induction.texlines 350–360 (eq:G-with-Q-A). - Blueprint:
blueprint/src/chapter/ch04_projective.tex(orthonormalization theorem).
Error functions #
The combined error of the orthonormalization and completion chain.
Substituting δ := orthonormalizationError ζ = 100·ζ^{1/4} into the
closeness conclusion of prop:completing-to-measurement
(2·δ + 4·√δ + 2·ζ) gives
`2 · (100·ζ^{1/4}) + 4 · √(100·ζ^{1/4}) + 2·ζ
= 200·ζ^{1/4} + 40·ζ^{1/8} + 2·ζ`.
This is the literal error returned by composing the two existing lemmas.
The paper's printed ζ₂ = 200·ζ^{1/4} + 40·ζ^{1/8} (inductive_step.tex,
line 149) drops the residual 2·ζ term; the formal cascade absorbs it into
the widened scalar 200·ζ^{1/4} + 42·ζ^{1/8}.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Square-root simplification for the orthonormalization error.
The formal cascade scalar with coefficient 42 absorbs the literal
orthonormalize-and-complete error in the non-vacuous unit regime.
Permutation-invariant right-register transport #
On a permutation-invariant bipartite state, the state-dependent distance between right-lifted local submeasurements equals the distance between their left lifts.
This is the bookkeeping needed for the Bob-side completion estimate in
inductive_step.tex lines 140--147: orthonormalizeAndComplete naturally
returns a left-register bound, and the paper also uses the corresponding
right-register bound for $I \otimes G^{\mathrm B}$ and $I \otimes Q^{\mathrm B}$.
This is the submeasurement specialization of
Preliminaries.qSDDCore_rightTensor_eq_leftTensor_of_permInv.
Transport an SDDRel bound from left lifts to right lifts on a
permutation-invariant bipartite state.
Projective self-consistency handoff #
Handoff data for the projective-measurement part of the orthonormalization proof.
Faithful encoding: The three fields record the paper's pre-projective
consistency and the two completion-closeness estimates from
references/ldt-paper/inductive_step.tex:130-149. This is not a bridge or
residual assumption on a source theorem: ProjectivizationChain.Output
constructs the record from the orthonormalization and completion outputs before
ProjectivizationChain.Handoff uses it.
The fields are exactly the hypotheses needed after the orthonormalization and
completion constructions have produced projective measurements Q_A,Q_B close to
the pre-projective measurements G_A,G_B. The theorem
ProjectivizationSelfConsistencyHandoff.fullPolynomialConsistency in
ProjectivizationChain.Handoff turns this data into the paper's
projective-measurement consistency estimate.
- preProjectiveConsistency : ConsRel ψ (uniformDistribution Unit) (constSubMeasFamily G_A.toSubMeas) (constSubMeasFamily G_B.toSubMeas) ζ₁
Paper line 131, obtained before the projective measurements are produced.
- leftCompletionCloseness : SDDRel ψ (uniformDistribution Unit) (constSubMeasFamily G_A.liftLeft) (constSubMeasFamily Q_A.liftLeft) ζ₂
Left-register completion closeness, paper line 146 (
eq:G-with-Q-A). - rightCompletionCloseness : SDDRel ψ (uniformDistribution Unit) (constSubMeasFamily G_B.liftRight) (constSubMeasFamily Q_B.liftRight) ζ₂
Right-register completion closeness, paper line 147.