Documentation

MIPRE.Background.LIDT.MIPStarRE.LDT.Preliminaries.ComparisonProjective

Preliminary comparison theorems: projective converse #

Projective-case converse of prop:simeq-to-approx. This lemma lives in a sibling module to ComparisonCore because its proof uses projSubMeas_diagMass_eq_mass, which is introduced in SwitchSandwichPrep.Core, downstream of ComparisonCore.

The imports above are chosen to make the direct dependencies explicit rather than relying on transitive re-exports through SwitchSandwichPrep.Core: ComparisonCore is the sibling comparison module, ConsistencyBridges supplies the BipartiteSDDRel/ConsRel bridging machinery, and SwitchSandwichPrep.Core provides projSubMeas_diagMass_eq_mass.

theorem MIPStarRE.LDT.Preliminaries.approxToSimeq {Question : Type u_1} {Outcome : Type u_2} {ι : Type u_3} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype Outcome] (ψ : QuantumState (ι × ι)) (𝒟 : Distribution Question) (A B : IdxProjMeas Question Outcome ι) (δ : Error) :

Projective converse of prop:simeq-to-approx (Proposition 4.9 of references/ldt-paper/preliminaries.tex, lines 426--455).

For projective measurements A, B, the relation at strength 2·δ implies the relation at strength δ, making the paper's implication an iff in the projective case (the forward direction is simeqToApprox).

theorem MIPStarRE.LDT.Preliminaries.approxToSimeq_heterogeneous {Question : Type u_1} {Outcome : Type u_2} {ιA : Type u_3} {ιB : Type u_4} [Fintype ιA] [DecidableEq ιA] [Fintype ιB] [DecidableEq ιB] [Fintype Outcome] (ψ : QuantumState (ιA × ιB)) (𝒟 : Distribution Question) (A : IdxProjMeas Question Outcome ιA) (B : IdxProjMeas Question Outcome ιB) (δ : Error) :

Heterogeneous projective converse of prop:simeq-to-approx.

For projective measurements acting on different tensor factors, a state-dependent-distance estimate at strength 2·δ for the placed families implies the corresponding bipartite consistency statement at strength δ.