Amplification by an algebra with dyadic matrix units #
The orthonormalization step of the C6b port applies in dyadic pairs (BipartiteModel.IsDyadicPair,
MIPRE/Foundations/DyadicPair.lean), and the finite pairs that commutingFinitePairApprox builds
are the ancilla extensions of standard-form models stdModel M ψ of tracial algebras M, which
need not have any matrix units. This file tensors them with a fixed tracial algebra B that has
unital dyadic matrix units, at no cost in value (reports/c6b-paper-proofs.md, §3, Theorems A and
T).
- The standard-form pair of
M ⊗ Bis dyadic (isDyadicPair_stdModel_tensorStep, Theorem A): the units1 ⊗ fᵢⱼofM ⊗ Bact on the left inR(M ⊗ B)'and, through the opposite algebra, on the right inR(M ⊗ B)''. So are its ancilla extensions with nonempty registers (BipartiteModel.IsDyadicPair.expand), whence both hypotheseshIIof the orthonormalization step. - Amplification (
amplify, Theorem T): a tracial strategy(σ, E, F)inMgives the tracial strategy(σ ⊗ 1, E ⊗ 1, F ⊗ 1)inM ⊗ B, of the same correlation (amplify_correlation), the trace ofM ⊗ Brestricting to that ofMonM ⊗ 1. - The value consequence (
exists_tracialStrategy_isDyadicPair): strict tracial reduction with a strategy whose standard-form model is dyadic in every state, which is whatcommutingFinitePairApproxneeds to land in dyadic pairs.
The standard-form pair of an amplified algebra #
The left action as a ∗-homomorphism into R(𝒜)': StdTracialAlgebra.L, corestricted to
the first player's algebra of the standard-form model.
Equations
- MIPRE.Repetition.leftVNHom M = M.L.codRestrict M.vnAlg ⋯
Instances For
The right action as a ∗-homomorphism into R(𝒜)'': StdTracialAlgebra.R, on the
opposite algebra, corestricted to the second player's algebra of the standard-form model.
Equations
Instances For
The standard-form model of a tracial algebra with unital dyadic matrix units is a dyadic
pair (lem:amplification-dyadic, item A), in every state: the units act on the left in R(𝒜)' and, through the opposite algebra,
on the right in R(𝒜)''.
M ⊗ B has unital dyadic matrix units when B has (lem:amplification-dyadic, item A):
the units 1 ⊗ fᵢⱼ.
The standard-form pair of M ⊗ B is a dyadic pair (lem:amplification-dyadic, item A;
Theorem A of reports/c6b-paper-proofs.md, §3) when B has unital dyadic matrix units, in every
state.
The embedding a ↦ a ⊗ 1 of M into M ⊗ B: StdTracialAlgebra.stepInclLeft, typed
into the carrier of tensorStep M B, so that its images carry that algebra's instances.
Equations
- MIPRE.Repetition.inclLeft M B = M.stepInclLeft B
Instances For
The trace of M ⊗ B restricts to that of M on M ⊗ 1.
Amplification of a tracial strategy #
A ∗-homomorphism maps positive elements to positive elements: it carries a sum of squares
∑ cᵢ⋆ cᵢ to the sum of squares of the images. Unlike IsPosElem.starAlgHom_map, it asks for no
StarModule instance, which instance search does not find on the carrier of tensorStep.
The amplified strategy (lem:amplification-dyadic, item T; Theorem T of
reports/c6b-paper-proofs.md, §3): the density σ ⊗ 1 and the measurements E ⊗ 1 and F ⊗ 1 in
M ⊗ B, for a tracial strategy (σ, E, F) in M.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The amplified strategy has the same correlation (lem:amplification-dyadic, item T), the
trace of M ⊗ B restricting to that of M on M ⊗ 1.
The standard-form model of an amplified strategy is a dyadic pair
(lem:amplification-dyadic), in every state, when B has unital dyadic matrix units.
Strict tracial reduction into dyadic pairs (lem:amplification-dyadic, its consequence):
below ω_co(H) lies the winning probability of a tracial strategy whose standard-form model is a
dyadic pair in every state, given one tracial algebra B with unital dyadic matrix units. It is
CommutingRepetition.strict_tracial_reduction followed by amplification by B, which keeps the
correlation (amplify_correlation).