Documentation

MIPRE.Tailored.Stages

The three stages of tailored compression, as hypotheses #

Paper II of the Aldous–Lyons track (Bowen–Chapman–Vidick, arXiv:2501.00173): question reduction (thm:h_level_question_reduciton, II:5712), answer reduction (thm:main_ans_red, II:6883) and parallel repetition (thm:repetition, II:11103), each in value form; the plan is planning/aldous-lyons-track.md, §4 and §5. Each structure is the data its theorem provides, in the vocabulary of MIPRE.Introspection, MIPRE.AnswerReduction and MIPRE.Repetition — the same parameters, budgets and soundness losses — with tailored verifiers in and out:

These are the Phase 0 contracts, written before any construction; the stages that inhabit them (Phases 2–4) may revise them, as the existing contracts were revised when theirs were built. TailoredGapCompression.ofTailoredPipeline, their composition, is Phase 5.

Question reduction (II:5712) for ℓ-level tailored inputs, in value form. On the plan's Route A its inhabitant is a tailored presentation of the repository's introspection verifier (MIPRE.Introspection.seven), applied to the input padded to constant lengths (II:6219): the same sampler, an answer-length calculator reading the question's type, and a linear-constraints processor whose constraints accept exactly what the introspective decider accepts.

Instances For

    Answer reduction (II:6883) for ℓ-level tailored inputs, in value form: the paper's tailored PCP (purification, oracularization, triangulation, decoupling, the output indicator and its decoupled Cook–Levin description, the low-degree test), with the parameters (λ, μ, σ) and the budgets of MIPRE.AnswerReduction.

    Instances For
      @[reducible, inline]
      abbrev MIPRE.Tailored.TailoredRepetition.arg (lam tau n : ℕ) (R : Budget) (s : ℕ) :

      The argument of the polynomial bounding the repeated verifier at index n: the repetition count, the input's budget and description length, the parameters, and 10^{R.k}, the input's cost on the dimension query (as in MIPRE.Repetition.arg, without the parse length, which a tailored verifier does not need).

      Equations
      Instances For

        Parallel repetition (II:11103) of ℓ-level tailored verifiers, in value form and direct rather than anchored: k(n) = Repetition.reps λ τ n independent copies, the lengths added coordinate by coordinate, the constraints of each coordinate padded with zeros to the whole answer (II:11464–11516), and the soundness of the vendored direct repetition theorem (MIPRE.Repetition.quantumValue_repeat_le). The paper's anchored, entanglement-preserving form is not needed on the plan's route (§4.1).

        Instances For