Documentation

MIPRE.Background.Repetition.CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.Density

The ‖·‖_ψ toolkit #

The trivial half: ‖x y Ω‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ‖y Ω‖.

theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_eq_of_sq_eq {a b : } (ha : 0 a) (hb : 0 b) (h : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2) :
a = b
theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.conjJm_apply_Ω_of_isCentral {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {w : K →L[] K} (hw : Modular.IsCentral M Ω w) (hwsa : IsSelfAdjoint w) :
(Modular.conjJm M Ω w) Ω = w Ω

A self-adjoint central element acts on Ω through the commutant: w Ω = (J w J) Ω for w ∈ M self-adjoint and commuting with R.

theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_mul_right_apply_Ω_le {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {w y : K →L[] K} (hw : Modular.IsCentral M Ω w) (hwsa : IsSelfAdjoint w) (hy : y M) :
(y * w) Ω w * y Ω

HJX Lemma 2.5(ii): ‖y w Ω‖ ≤ ‖w‖ ‖y Ω‖ for w self-adjoint in the centralizer.

theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_conj_unitary_apply_Ω {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {u y : K →L[] K} (hu : Modular.IsCentral M Ω u) (hu1 : star u * u = 1) (hy : y M) :
(u * y * star u) Ω = y Ω

Conjugation by a unitary of the centralizer is ‖·‖_ψ-isometric.

theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_mul_unitary_apply_Ω {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {u y : K →L[] K} (hu : Modular.IsCentral M Ω u) (hu2 : u * star u = 1) (hy : y M) :
(y * u) Ω = y Ω

Multiplying on the right by a unitary of the centralizer is ‖·‖_ψ-isometric.

theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_commutator_central_le {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {w y : K →L[] K} (hw : Modular.IsCentral M Ω w) (hwsa : IsSelfAdjoint w) (hy : y M) :
(w * y - y * w) Ω 2 * w * y Ω

‖[w, y]Ω‖ ≤ 2‖w‖‖yΩ‖ for w self-adjoint in the centralizer.

theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_commutator_pow_le {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {w y : K →L[] K} (hw : Modular.IsCentral M Ω w) (hwsa : IsSelfAdjoint w) (hy : y M) (k : ) :
(w ^ (k + 1) * y - y * w ^ (k + 1)) Ω (k + 1) * w ^ k * (w * y - y * w) Ω

‖[w^{k+1}, y]Ω‖ ≤ (k+1)‖w‖^k‖[w,y]Ω‖ for w self-adjoint in the centralizer.

theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_commutator_eit_le {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {w y : K →L[] K} (hw : Modular.IsCentral M Ω w) (hwsa : IsSelfAdjoint w) (hy : y M) (t : ) :
(Modular.eit w hwsa t * y - y * Modular.eit w hwsa t) Ω |t| * Real.exp (|t| * w) * (w * y - y * w) Ω

HJX Lemma 2.6(ii): ‖[e^{itw}, y]Ω‖ ≤ |t| e^{|t|‖w‖}‖[w,y]Ω‖.

Left-bounded elements #

x is left bounded with constant c: ψ(x* y x) ≤ c ψ(y) for 0 ≤ y ∈ M (HJX Lemma 2.5).

Equations
Instances For
    theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_mul_apply_Ω_le_of_leftBounded {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) {x : K →L[] K} {c : } (hc0 : 0 c) (hx : LeftBounded M Ω x c) {y : K →L[] K} (hy : y M) :
    (y * x) Ω c * y Ω

    ‖y x Ω‖ ≤ √c ‖y Ω‖ for a left-bounded x.

    theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_commutator_apply_Ω_le {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) {x : K →L[] K} {c : } (hc0 : 0 c) (hx : LeftBounded M Ω x c) {y : K →L[] K} (hy : y M) :
    (y * x - x * y) Ω (c + x) * y Ω

    The commutator estimate: ‖[y, x] Ω‖ ≤ (√c + ‖x‖) ‖y Ω‖ for a left-bounded x.

    theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.leftBounded_xk {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {k : } (hk : 0 < k) {x : K →L[] K} (hx : x M) :
    LeftBounded M Ω (Modular.xk M Ω k hk x) (Modular.xkFlat M Ω k hk x ^ 2)

    The Gaussian-smeared elements are left bounded (E4.5, HJX Lemma 2.5(i)).

    The bounded logarithms b_n = 2^{-n} a_n #

    e^{ikb_n} = λ(k2^{-n}) for every integer k.

    HJX Lemma 2.2 in this model: Ω̂ is Haar distributed for b_n, because the vectors λ(k2^{-n})Ω̂ = δ_{k2^{-n}} ⊗ Ω are pairwise orthogonal.

    HJX Lemma 2.6(i): ‖[b_n, x]Ω̂‖ → 0 #

    ‖[λ(q), x]Ω̂‖ = ‖xΩ̂ − Δ̂^{-iq}(xΩ̂)‖, because λ(q) is unitary and λ(-q)xλ(q) = σ̂_{-q}(x).

    HJX Lemma 2.6(i): ‖[b_n, x] Ω̂‖ → 0 for every x ∈ ℛ.

    HJX Lemma 2.6(iii) and the density theorem #

    theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_σ_xin_sub_le {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) (n : ) (t : ) {x : Crossed.L2Q K →L[] Crossed.L2Q K} (hx : x Crossed.crossed M Ω) :
    (Modular.σ (Crossed.crossed M Ω) (xin Ω n) t x) (Crossed.Ωh Ω) - x (Crossed.Ωh Ω) (Modular.Δit (Crossed.crossed M Ω) (Crossed.Ωh Ω) t) (x (Crossed.Ωh Ω)) - x (Crossed.Ωh Ω) + (Modular.eit (an n) t * x - x * Modular.eit (an n) t) (Crossed.Ωh Ω)

    HJX Lemma 2.6(iii), pointwise in t: on , ‖σ^{ξ_n}_t(x)Ω̂ − xΩ̂‖ ≤ ‖Δ̂^{it}(xΩ̂) − xΩ̂‖ + ‖[e^{ita_n}, x]Ω̂‖.

    theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.norm_Phi_sub_le {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) (n : ) {x : Crossed.L2Q K →L[] Crossed.L2Q K} {C : } (h : tSet.Ioc 0 (Tn n), (Modular.σ (Crossed.crossed M Ω) (xin Ω n) t x) (Crossed.Ωh Ω) - x (Crossed.Ωh Ω) C) :
    (Phi M Ω n x) (Crossed.Ωh Ω) - x (Crossed.Ωh Ω) C

    The averaging bound: a uniform bound on [0, 2^{-n}] bounds ‖(Φ_n x − x)Ω̂‖.

    theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.tendsto_Phi_apply {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {x : Crossed.L2Q K →L[] Crossed.L2Q K} (hx : x Crossed.crossed M Ω) :
    Filter.Tendsto (fun (n : ) => (Phi M Ω n x) (Crossed.Ωh Ω)) Filter.atTop (nhds (x (Crossed.Ωh Ω)))

    Haagerup's density theorem (the final lemma of HJX §2): Φ_n(x)Ω̂ → xΩ̂ for every x ∈ ℛ. Since Φ_n(x) ∈ ℛ_n (E6.4), the union ⋃_n ℛ_n is ‖·‖_{ψ̂}-dense in .

    theorem CommutingRepetition.VN.Haagerup.exists_mem_Rn_approx {K : Type u_1} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace K] [CompleteSpace K] (M : VonNeumannAlgebra K) (Ω : K) (hs : IsSeparating (↑M) Ω) (hc : IsCyclic (↑M) Ω) {x : Crossed.L2Q K →L[] Crossed.L2Q K} (hx : x Crossed.crossed M Ω) {ε : } ( : 0 < ε) :
    ∃ (n : ), yRn M Ω n, y (Crossed.Ωh Ω) - x (Crossed.Ωh Ω) < ε

    ⋃_n ℛ_n is ‖·‖_{ψ̂}-dense in : every x ∈ ℛ is ‖·‖_{ψ̂}-approximated by Φ_n(x) ∈ ℛ_n.