The sofic value is not approximable, from a halting reduction to tailored games #
The argument of Corollary I:2144 without the measure side. Suppose a computable f approximates
the sofic value of every test to within 1/(k+1), and let g be a computable reduction from the
halting problem to tailored games (TailoredGameValue.TailoredHaltingReduction). Main
Theorem II separates the associated tests of the two kinds of games:
- a halting machine gives a game with a perfect ZPC strategy, whose test has sofic value
1; - a non-halting machine gives a game of value at most
1/2, whose test has sofic value at most1 − 1/(2K), withK = K(Λ)a computable function of the answer length.
Approximating to within 1/(4K + 1) tells the two apart, which decides the halting problem.
not_sofValueApproximable_of takes the two clauses of Main Theorem II as hypotheses, in the form
MainTheoremII K.
The two clauses of Main Theorem II (Theorem I:2126) in the form the corollary uses, for a
gap function K of the answer length: perfect ZPC games have tests of sofic value 1, and games
of synchronous value at most 1/2 have tests of sofic value at most 1 − 1/(2K(Λ)).
- complete (g : TailoredGameValue.TailoredGameData) : g.HasPerfectZPC → (assocTest g).valSof = 1
Instances For
The sofic value is not approximable (the measure-free part of Corollary I:2144): from a halting reduction to tailored games and Main Theorem II with a primitive recursive gap function, no computable function approximates the sofic value of every subgroup test.